In a significant legal development, the owner of the farm featured in actor Vikram's recent video has been granted anticipatory bail regarding the illegal possession and delayed registration of Lar gibbons.
- Perundurai farm owner S.K. Keshavanathan granted anticipatory bail by Principal District Judge S. Sameena.
- The case involves delayed registration of three Lar gibbons and failure to report a death.
- Defense cited technical glitches in the PARIVESH portal as the reason for delay.
- Court imposed a ₹25,000 surety and mandatory reporting to the Forest Department.
The legal saga surrounding the rare Lar gibbon video featuring actor Vikram has taken a new turn. On Thursday, Principal District Judge S. Sameena granted anticipatory bail to S.K. Keshavanathan, a farm owner from Perundurai, who was embroiled in a case involving violations of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.
The controversy erupted following a video involving the popular actor, which prompted the Erode Forest Division to conduct an inspection of Keshavanathan's farmhouse. The subsequent investigation led to a formal case registered on August 14, alleging that the owner failed to register three Lar gibbons within the mandatory period and neglected to report the death of another specimen to the authorities.
Historical Background of Wildlife Regulations
Under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, the possession of exotic or rare species is strictly regulated. Owners are required to register live animals within a specific timeframe via government portals like PARIVESH. Failure to comply can lead to criminal charges, as the state aims to prevent illegal wildlife trafficking and ensure the welfare of non-native species.
Legal Arguments and Court Proceedings
During the hearing, Keshavanathan's legal counsel argued that the delay in registration was not intentional. They contended that a technical glitch in the PARIVESH portal prevented the timely completion of the mandatory 30-day registration process, noting the delay was only eight days.
However, the prosecution vehemently opposed the bail plea. They highlighted that the accused had also failed to report the death of a Lar gibbon within the prescribed 15-day window. The prosecution expressed concerns that granting bail might allow the accused to tamper with crucial documentation related to the animals.
Why This Matters
BozokMedia analysis shows that this case highlights a critical vulnerability in the intersection of wildlife conservation and digital governance. When government-mandated registration portals fail, citizens face legal repercussions, creating a conflict between administrative efficiency and environmental law enforcement.
The intersection of celebrity influence and wildlife law underscores the intense scrutiny placed on the private ownership of exotic species in India.
In a related development, the Perundurai court has adjourned the hearing regarding the relocation of 11 seized exotic animals—including African serval cats and tufted capuchin monkeys—to August 22. These animals currently remain under Forest Department custody.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What were the specific charges against S.K. Keshavanathan?
He was charged with failing to register three Lar gibbons on time and failing to report the death of one gibbon to the Forest Department.
2. What are the conditions of his bail?
The court imposed a surety of ₹25,000 and directed him to sign at the Forest Department office for 15 days.