The Supreme Court has demanded a detailed report on the harassment of a 14-year-old girl and her family following an assault on her father by Hindutva influencer Swatantra Bhardwaj during a Delhi protest.
- Supreme Court seeks urgent reports from Delhi and UP authorities regarding the safety of a minor girl.
- The case stems from an assault by influencer Swatantra Bhardwaj on the girl's father.
- CJI Surya Kant emphasizes that intimidation of children during legal proceedings is unacceptable.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India on Thursday intervened in a distressing case involving a 14-year-old girl who participated in a Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) protest in Delhi. The court has sought a comprehensive report following allegations that the minor is being systematically harassed after her father was assaulted by Hindutva influencer Swatantra Bhardwaj, who is currently incarcerated in connection with the attack.
A bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice V Mohana stated that allegations involving the harassment of a minor cannot be overlooked. The bench underscored the fundamental principle that no child or their family should be subjected to external pressure or intimidation while pursuing legitimate criminal proceedings.
Why This Matters
BozokMedia analysis shows that this case highlights a growing trend of 'digital vigilantism' where social media influencers attempt to leverage their following to bypass legal accountability. When allegations surface that law enforcement officers may have accompanied attackers, it raises critical questions about the neutrality of the state machinery and the vulnerability of young activists in the current socio-political climate.
During the proceedings, the counsel for the minor revealed a chilling detail: despite the filing of an FIR, no action has been taken against the accomplices who accompanied Bhardwaj during the June assault. The lawyer presented claims that video evidence shows four policemen accompanying the attackers and alleged that stones were thrown at the girl's residence to intimidate her.
"The protection of a child is a non-negotiable mandate of the state; any attempt to browbeat a minor into silence is a direct assault on the rule of law."
CJI Kant expressed grave concern, noting that if anti-social elements who indulge in violence against children are roaming free and attempting to intimidate victims, it constitutes a serious breach of public order. He categorically stated, "Child is a child. Some measures to protect the child can be taken."
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed the court that he had become aware of the situation through the girl's social media posts. Consequently, Justice Joymalya Bagchi directed that immediate steps be taken on the FIR and that the girl and her family be provided with immediate police protection.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: Who is Swatantra Bhardwaj in this context?
Swatantra Bhardwaj is a Hindutva influencer who was allegedly involved in the assault of a protester's father during a CJP protest in Delhi.
Q2: What specific orders did the Supreme Court pass?
The court ordered the provision of police protection for the minor and her family and demanded reports from Delhi and UP authorities on the FIR and security measures.