The Bombay High Court has ruled that the mere breakdown of a consensual relationship cannot be criminalized. The court quashed an FIR against a doctor accused of sexual intercourse based on a false promise of marriage.

  • Bombay HC rules that a consensual breakup does not equate to criminal deceit.
  • FIR quashed under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
  • Court emphasizes that criminal law must be a shield against fraud, not a weapon for personal vendettas.

In a significant judgment, the Bombay High Court observed that "every romantic failure cannot be painted as deceit" and a mere breakup of a relationship between a consenting couple cannot result in the initiation of criminal proceedings. The court set aside an FIR against a 45-year-old doctor who was accused of having sexual intercourse with a 49-year-old widowed doctor on a false promise of marriage.

Justice Abhay J Mantri, presiding at the Kolhapur circuit bench, allowed the plea after reviewing the facts of the case. The complainant had alleged that the petitioner maintained a sexual relationship with her between January 2019 and June 2023 under the pretext of divorcing his wife to marry her. However, the court found the allegations lacked the necessary legal threshold for criminal prosecution.

Read Also:Young Man Beaten to Death with Sticks in East Delhi's Mayur Vihar; CCTV Probe Underway

Why This Matters

BozokMedia analysis shows that this ruling serves as a critical check against the misuse of gender-specific laws to settle personal scores. By distinguishing between 'disappointment' and 'deceit', the court is protecting the principle of autonomy in adult consensual relationships.

"The object of the legislature was to punish deceit and not disappointment."

The court elaborated that for an offence under Section 69 of the BNS, the prosecution must establish that the promise of marriage was false from its very inception. If the acts were consensual and voluntary, devoid of coercion or misrepresentation, no criminal offence is made out. The court noted that the prosecution failed to prove that the intent was fraudulent from the start.

Crucially, the court examined WhatsApp chats between the parties. The evidence revealed that the petitioner never explicitly promised marriage; instead, the two had jointly searched for marriage proposals for the complainant. The chats indicated that the complainant was aware of the petitioner's marital status and expressed a desire to be with him regardless.

Historically, Indian courts have struggled with the intersection of consent and promise. For years, the 'false promise of marriage' has been a contentious point in Indian jurisprudence. This ruling aligns with several Supreme Court precedents which state that a breach of promise is not the same as a promise never intended to be kept.

Did You Know?: The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) has replaced the Indian Penal Code (IPC), introducing specific nuances to crimes involving deceitful means for sexual intercourse.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Does a breakup automatically justify a criminal case for a false promise?
No. The court ruled that a mere breakup between consenting adults is not a crime unless fraud is proven from the inception.

p>2. What is Section 69 of the BNS?
It is the legal provision that penalizes sexual intercourse by employing deceitful means, such as a false promise of marriage.