A couple claiming divine inspiration launched INDXcoin, convincing over 500 fellow Christians to invest their life savings. The project eventually collapsed, leaving investors devastated and highlighting a systemic lack of crypto regulation.
- Over 500 investors lost more than $3 million in the failed INDXcoin project.
- The founders, Eli and Kaitlyn Regalado, claimed their business decisions were direct commands from God.
- The collapse underscores the vulnerability of investors in unregulated digital asset markets.
In a startling intersection of faith and finance, Eli and Kaitlyn Regalado convinced hundreds of evangelical Christians to invest their life savings into a cryptocurrency called INDXcoin. The couple claimed that their transition into the digital asset space was not a business decision, but a divine mandate. Eli Regalado describes receiving "heavenly dispatches"—thoughts that were not his own—which he believed were direct instructions from God.
The Regalados' history of obedience to these perceived divine prompts began with personal matters, such as marriage and home buying, before extending to their professional lives. In 2021, this "guidance" led them to the world of cryptocurrency. After receiving a gift of digital coins from family, Eli claims he heard God say, "Take this to my people for a wealth transfer." This belief became the catalyst for launching INDXcoin, which was aggressively marketed within tight-knit Christian circles where trust is often based on shared faith rather than financial due diligence.
The human cost of this venture is staggering. Debbie and Jose Bonilla, a retired couple, withdrew $70,000 from their retirement accounts—a significant portion of their nest egg—to invest in the coin based on the recommendation of a trusted minister. They were among more than 500 people who poured over $3 million into the scheme. Within a year, the project collapsed entirely, and the money "evaporated," leaving the investors with nothing.
Why This Matters
BozokMedia analysis shows that this case is a textbook example of "affinity fraud," where scammers exploit the trust within a specific group—in this case, a religious community. The Regalados leveraged spiritual authority to bypass the skepticism that typically accompanies high-risk investments. When faith is used as a shield against financial scrutiny, investors are stripped of their natural defenses.
"The lack of adequate disclosure and the fragmentation of regulatory oversight create a playground for manipulation and fraud in the crypto sector."
The broader context of this collapse is a global surge in crypto-related crime. According to Chainalysis, crypto scammers collected at least $14 billion worldwide in 2025. In the United States, the FBI has reported $7.2 billion in losses from fraudulent schemes. This rise is fueled by the ease of minting new coins; in August 2026 alone, over 3 million new cryptocurrencies were created, many with no intrinsic value.
Furthermore, the regulatory landscape in the U.S. has become increasingly fragmented. While the SEC and CFTC theoretically oversee these markets, inconsistent definitions and a recent political shift toward "eliminating regulatory overreach" have left investors exposed. With the Justice Department disbanding key crypto-crime units, the path to recovery for victims like the Bonillas remains bleak.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is affinity fraud?
Affinity fraud occurs when a fraudster targets members of a specific group, such as a religious, ethnic, or professional community, using the group's trust to deceive them.
Why is crypto regulation so difficult in the US?
Regulation is split across multiple agencies (SEC, CFTC, FBI) with overlapping and often conflicting definitions of what constitutes a security versus a commodity.