The People’s Legal Forum has called for an urgent high-level investigation into the killing of three locals by forest officials in the Cauvery Wildlife Sanctuary, alleging severe procedural lapses and human rights violations.

  • Three locals were killed in a shoot-out at Cauvery Wildlife Sanctuary, Hanur.
  • People’s Legal Forum alleges failure to follow Supreme Court and Human Rights Commission guidelines.
  • Claims suggest victims were exercising rights under the Forest Rights Act and PESA Act.

The People’s Legal Forum has formally demanded a high-level inquiry into a tragic incident that occurred early Saturday in the Cauvery Wildlife Sanctuary of Hanur taluk. The incident, which resulted in the deaths of three individuals, has sparked outrage over the conduct of the Forest Department and the alleged disregard for legal protocols during the aftermath of the shoot-out.

Advocate Baburaj Palladan, the director of the forum, highlighted that the victims were local residents who frequently entered the forest areas. He asserted that these individuals were not intruders but were exercising their legal rights as enshrined under the Forest Rights Act and the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) (PESA) Act, which provide specific protections and land rights to tribal and local communities in scheduled areas.

Read Also:JPSC Recruitment Scam: Candidate Reveals ₹80 Lakh Job Deal in CID Interrogation

Why This Matters

BozokMedia analysis shows that this incident highlights a recurring conflict between state conservation efforts and the ancestral rights of forest-dwelling communities. When forest officials act as judge, jury, and executioner without following standard operating procedures, it undermines the rule of law and risks escalating regional tensions between the state and marginalized populations.

A primary point of contention raised by Mr. Palladan is the handling of the crime scene. He alleged that the Forest Department officials, who were well aware of the victims' identities and addresses, shifted the bodies from the forest for post-mortem examinations without notifying the jurisdictional police. This action, according to the forum, effectively bypassed the mandatory legal process of securing a crime scene.

The failure to conduct a spot mahazar and the immediate removal of bodies suggests a calculated attempt to obscure evidence and evade judicial scrutiny.

The forum further claimed that no spot mahazar (on-site verification/record) was conducted, which is a critical requirement in any death involving state actors. By failing to comply with the guidelines set by the Supreme Court of India and the Human Rights Commission, the forum argues that the forest officials may have acted with impunity.

Furthermore, the People’s Legal Forum questioned the necessity of lethal force. Mr. Palladan stated that there was no "grave situation" that would have justified shooting to kill, suggesting that the response was disproportionate and illegal. The demand for a high-level probe is aimed at ensuring that the erring officials are held accountable for what is being termed as an avoidable tragedy.

Did You Know?: The PESA Act of 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas in scheduled areas to manage their own natural resources, often creating a legal friction point with centralized Forest Department regulations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: What is the PESA Act mentioned in the case?
The Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act provides self-governance to tribal communities, granting them significant control over local resources and land.

Q2: Why is the lack of a 'spot mahazar' significant?
A spot mahazar is a legal record of the crime scene; without it, it becomes nearly impossible to independently verify the sequence of events or the positioning of the victims.