The Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) has proposed allowing consumers to self-certify safety measures for new power connections, sparking a clash between residents and electrical contractors.
- KERC's Electricity Supply Regulations Draft, 2026 includes a new self-certification clause.
- Consumers may soon certify electrical safety compliance themselves.
- Electrical contractors and energy experts warn of increased safety risks and regulatory violations.
- KERC defends the move as a way to reduce red tape and corruption.
Bengaluru: A proposed amendment in the Electricity Supply Regulations Draft, 2026, by the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) has ignited a fierce debate across the state. The clause seeks to allow building owners to self-certify that necessary safety measures have been implemented before being granted new electricity connections.
The proposal has created a sharp divide between stakeholders. While residents have lauded the move as a way to bypass bureaucratic hurdles, the Karnataka State Licensed Electrical Contractors’ Association (KSLECA) has voiced strong opposition. Currently, only licensed contractors are legally authorized to certify that electrical installations meet safety standards.
Why This Matters
BozokMedia analysis shows that this regulatory shift sits at the intersection of consumer empowerment and public safety. While the intent is to streamline a historically slow process, the technical complexity of electrical safety means that errors in self-certification could lead to catastrophic consequences, including fires and electrocution.
Allowing the common man to take charge of electrical safety without professional oversight could lead to a significant increase in life-threatening accidents.
M.G. Prabhakar, an advisor to the Energy Committee and member of the Federation of Karnataka Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FKCCI), argued that the move contradicts Central Electricity Authority (CEA) safety regulations. He cautioned that just because other states have adopted similar measures, it does not necessarily make it a safe or wise policy for Karnataka.
Addressing the backlash, P. Ravikumar, Chairman of KERC, clarified the commission's stance. He emphasized that self-certification does not mean consumers must perform technical inspections themselves. "It means they can get it inspected and certified by their own contractors, licensed electricians, or electrical engineers," Ravikumar stated, noting that the goal is to prevent consumers from 'running from pillar to post' for basic connections.
From a consumer perspective, the benefits are clear. Representatives from residents' welfare associations in Bengaluru have welcomed the change, citing it as a potent tool against corruption. They argue that the current system often involves unofficial payments to middlemen and contractors, a practice that self-certification could effectively dismantle.
| Feature | Current System | Proposed KERC System |
|---|---|---|
| Certification Authority | Licensed Contractors Only | Consumers (via chosen experts) |
| Primary Goal | Strict Safety Compliance | Ease of Access & Reduced Red Tape |
| Risk Factor | Lower (Professional oversight) | Higher (Potential for error) |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
1. What is the core of the KERC controversy?
The controversy involves whether consumers should be allowed to certify their own electrical safety compliance to speed up new connections.
2. Will this move increase electricity-related accidents?
Experts fear so, arguing that non-professional certification could lead to substandard installations and safety hazards.
