Sonam Wangchuk’s indefinite hunger strike over alleged NEET irregularities has now entered its 18th day. As his health deteriorates, the Delhi High Court has asked both the Centre and Delhi government for an urgent medical intervention.

मुख्य बिंदु (Key Takeaways)

  • Sonam Wangchuk’s hunger strike reaches day 18
  • Delhi High Court seeks immediate medical intervention from Centre and State
  • Alleged irregularities in NEET and other national exams under scrutiny

Renowned climate activist Sonam Wangchuk began an indefinite hunger strike to protest alleged irregularities in the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) and other key examinations. The fast has now entered its 18th day, and growing concerns over his health have prompted the Delhi High Court to intervene.

Background and Motives

Wangchuk first raised allegations of question‑paper leaks and manipulation in the 2023 NEET cycle, claiming that the selection process was compromised. Subsequent reports of similar irregularities across other national testing bodies intensified public debate, pushing Wangchuk to demand not just administrative fixes but also judicial oversight.

Health Deterioration and Risks

Medical experts and human‑rights groups have warned that prolonged fasting poses severe risks, especially for a 30‑year‑old individual. Reports indicate that Wangchuk is now showing signs of dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and weakening vital signs, prompting urgent calls for hospitalisation.

Delhi High Court’s Intervention

In response to a petition filed by concerned parties, the Delhi High Court ordered an urgent hearing. The bench directed both the Union Government and the Delhi Government to file responses to a plea seeking immediate medical assistance, emphasizing that denial could amount to a violation of fundamental health rights.

Potential Outcomes and Future Trajectory

If the court’s directive is enforced, Wangchuk could be admitted to a government medical facility, and an independent probe into the alleged exam irregularities may be launched. Conversely, a refusal or delay could fuel wider public unrest, possibly leading to mass protests and heightened scrutiny of India’s examination governance.

The episode underscores a complex interplay between civil activism, judicial oversight, and the right to health. As the strike progresses, all stakeholders face mounting pressure to balance humanitarian concerns with the broader demand for transparency in the nation’s educational assessment system.