The Hyderabad Karnataka Horata Samiti has called for a separate budget and ministry for the Kalyana Karnataka region, citing the failure of Article 371(J) to meet its objectives after 13 years.

Key Takeaways

  • Article 371(J) has failed to achieve its core objectives despite 13 years of implementation.
  • Demands include expanding benefits to agriculture, industry, and culture beyond just jobs and education.
  • Call for a separate Ministry and a dedicated budget for the Kalyana Karnataka region.
  • Urgent need for transparency in KKRDB fund utilization and action against fake domicile certificates.

KALABURAGI: The Hyderabad Karnataka Horata Samiti on Wednesday renewed its strong demand for the effective implementation of Article 371(J) of the Constitution. During a major convention, leaders asserted that the special constitutional provision has failed to reach its intended targets even after more than a decade of its existence.

The convention, held on the birth anniversary of former Minister Vaijnath Patil—the pioneer of the movement—emphasized that the benefits of the special status must transcend the current scope of education and public employment. Speakers urged the government to extend these provisions to agriculture, irrigation, industry, and the cultural preservation of the Kalyana Karnataka region.

Why This Matters

BozokMedia analysis shows that while legal frameworks like Article 371(J) provide the foundation for regional equity, the lack of sectoral integration (such as linking legal status to industrial and agricultural growth) prevents true socio-economic transformation. Without a dedicated administrative focus, constitutional promises remain mere paper guarantees.

The struggle for Article 371(J) was a decades-long battle for dignity, and its current half-hearted implementation is a disservice to that legacy.

Writer Allamprabhu Bettadur highlighted the need for greater recognition of the region's heritage, specifically mentioning Kavirajamarga and Basava Kalyana. He called for increased representation in state awards and cultural programs. Meanwhile, Umakant Niggudagi, former president of KKCCI, claimed that only 15-20% of the intended benefits have actually reached the local populace, citing limited industrial growth despite available land.

Historical Background

Article 371(J) was a hard-won constitutional amendment designed to address the historical neglect of the Hyderabad-Karnataka region. It was intended to provide a level playing field through reservations and developmental incentives, following decades of intense social and political mobilization.

Did You Know?: The Kalyana Karnataka region is the cradle of the Basaveshwara social reform movement, which fundamentally changed the social fabric of South India.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the primary grievance regarding Article 371(J)?
The primary grievance is that its benefits are limited to education and jobs, neglecting vital sectors like industry, irrigation, and culture.

2. What are the specific resolutions passed at the convention?
Resolutions include establishing an AIIMS in Raichur, creating a separate Ministry for the region, and ensuring transparency in KKRDB fund usage.