The Union Ministry of Tribal Affairs has redirected complaints over displacement and Forest Rights Act violations to the Madhya Pradesh government. This move highlights the division of responsibility between centre and state, while locals still await adequate compensation.

Key Takeaways

  • The centre has forwarded all grievances to the state government.
  • Implementation of the Forest Rights Act rests with the state.
  • Affected locals have not received full compensation or rehabilitation.

Overview

Opposition MPs raised concerns about displacement and alleged violations of the Forest Rights Act linked to the Ken‑Betwa river link project. In response, the Union Ministry of Tribal Affairs stated that these issues are being handled by the Madhya Pradesh government.

Historical Background

The Ken‑Betwa link is one of 30 projects under the 1980 National Perspective Plan (NPP) aimed at transferring surplus water to deficit regions. It involves a 221‑km canal and a 2‑km tunnel, displacing over 7,000 families.

Centre‑State Roles

According to the 2013 Right to Fair Compensation Act, all land acquisition, compensation, and rehabilitation activities are the responsibility of the state. Similarly, the 2006 Forest Rights Act designates the state as the implementing agency, even though the Union Jal Shakti Ministry leads the project.

Why This Matters

BozokMedia analysis shows that the shifting of responsibility may dilute accountability, leaving affected communities without timely redressal and exposing gaps in inter‑governmental coordination.

"Even the Union Ministry of Jal Shakti has limited scope," says Dr. Rajesh Kumar, policy analyst.
Did You Know?: The Ken‑Betwa project includes a 221‑km canal and a 2‑km tunnel, expected to generate 103 MW of hydro‑power and 27 MW of solar power.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Has the state government provided full compensation to all displaced families?

A: Comprehensive data is still pending, but many families report partial or no compensation.

Q2: Were there irregularities in the Gram Sabha consent process?

A: Protesters allege insufficient notice and participation, calling the consent process into question.