In a major legal escalation, Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia have moved the Delhi High Court against the CBI's revision petition following their acquittal in the Delhi excise policy case.

Key Takeaways

  • The lower court had acquitted Kejriwal, Sisodia, and 21 others.
  • CBI filed a revision petition just 4 hours after the acquittal verdict.
  • AAP leaders allege the CBI's move is 'extremely non-serious' and rushed.
  • The High Court is expected to hear the plea next week.

The legal battle surrounding the Delhi Excise Policy Scam has entered a high-stakes phase. Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) chief Arvind Kejriwal and former Deputy CM Manish Sisodia have approached the Delhi High Court. Their plea challenges the revision petition filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against their recent acquittal by a lower court.

The petitioners have raised serious questions regarding the legitimacy and timing of the agency's actions. They pointed out that the CBI filed its revision petition within a mere four hours of the trial court's judgment. The plea argues that this extreme haste demonstrates a lack of seriousness and suggests that the agency is intent on keeping the leaders entangled in litigation regardless of the evidence.

Why This Matters

BozokMedia analysis shows that this development shifts the focus from the alleged scam to the procedural conduct of central agencies. The Rouse Avenue Court had previously noted that the CBI failed to present any facts or evidence that prima facie proved the existence of a scam. Consequently, all 23 accused were discharged at the stage of framing charges, without the need to record witness testimonies.

The rapid-fire legal response by the CBI raises significant questions about the balance between investigative rigor and political motivation.

The excise policy, formulated by the Delhi government in 2021, was withdrawn following allegations of irregularities. The case was initiated following orders from Lieutenant Governor Vinay Kumar Saxena. The High Court is slated to begin hearings on the leaders' plea next week.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Why were the AAP leaders acquitted by the lower court?
The court ruled that the CBI lacked sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations of a scam at the initial stage.

2. What is the core argument of Kejriwal's new petition?
The petition argues that the CBI's appeal is a desperate attempt to continue the prosecution despite the lack of evidence.

Did You Know?: The entire case reached a turning point when the lower court discharged all 23 accused due to a lack of prima facie evidence.