DMK chief M.K. Stalin has approached the Madras High Court to declare TVK candidate V.S. Babu’s win in the Kolathur Assembly constituency void. The petition also demands a 100 % VVPAT slip count and verification of all 286 EVM machines deployed in the constituency.

  • Stalin files a petition to void V.S. Babu’s Kolathur win.
  • He seeks a full 100 % VVPAT count and verification of 286 EVMs.
  • Technical irregularities reported by senior advocate N.R. Elango were dismissed by the district officer.

Background

In the 2026 Tamil Nadu assembly elections, TVK’s V.S. Babu secured a narrow victory in Kolathur, a seat traditionally contested by the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK). Immediately after the results, DMK President M.K. Stalin commissioned senior advocate N.R. Elango to audit the electronic voting machines (EVMs) used in the constituency.

Key Points of the Petition

Stalin’s filing asserts that during the examination of 14 selected EVM sets—covering the Control Unit, Ballot Unit, and Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT)—serious technical irregularities emerged. Elango promptly reported these anomalies to the District Election Officer, but the officer claimed the verification was completed successfully on August 5.

Read Also:Controversy Erupts: CJP Chief's Old Tweet Mocking Rahul Gandhi as 'Vlogger' Resurfaces

Irregularities Uncovered

The audit revealed data loss, timestamp mismatches, and discrepancies between VVPAT slips and electronic tallies. Elango’s follow‑up letter on August 6 highlighted that engineering certificates could not replace a detailed failure report explaining the causes.

Election Commission’s Response

Despite multiple clarifications sought by Stalin’s team, the Election Commission has not issued a substantive response, prompting the high‑court filing to challenge the district officer’s order directly.

Stalin’s Additional Demands

Beyond nullifying the result, Stalin demands a 100 % recount of all VVPAT slips and a comprehensive verification of every one of the 286 machines deployed in Kolathur. He argues that partial data cannot legitimize the declared outcome.

Legal Implications

If the court upholds Stalin’s petition, it could set a precedent for stricter oversight of electronic voting across India, potentially mandating full VVPAT audits in future elections.

Why This Matters

BozokMedia analysis shows that the outcome of this petition could reshape electoral oversight mechanisms across India, compelling the Election Commission to adopt stricter verification protocols for electronic voting devices.

"Ensuring transparent EVM audits is essential not just for electoral validity but for preserving public trust in democracy," says election‑law expert Dr. Anita Rao.
Did You Know?: Tamil Nadu introduced mandatory VVPAT verification after the 2016 elections, yet a full 100 % count has only been ordered twice before.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question 1: What could be the possible outcome of Stalin’s petition in the High Court?

Answer: If the court annuls the result, a fresh count or even a re‑poll in Kolathur may be ordered.

Question 2: Why is a full technical audit of EVMs crucial in this case?

Answer: Any technical flaw in EVMs can compromise the accurate reflection of voter intent, raising doubts about the legitimacy of the election outcome.