Chief priest Kandararu Rajeevaru of the Sabarimala Ayyappa Temple has tendered his resignation on health grounds and proposed his son, Kandararu Brahmadathan, as his successor. The move follows his arrest in January 2026 amid the ongoing gold theft investigation.

Key Takeaways

  • Kandararu Rajeevaru resigns as Tantri
  • His son is proposed as successor
  • Decision comes amid gold theft probe

Located in Pathanamthitta, Kerala, the Sabarimala Ayyappa Temple holds a unique place in India's religious landscape. On July 11, 2026, its chief priest, Kandararu Rajeevaru, wrote to the Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB) requesting to step down, citing ill health, and suggested his son, Kandararu Brahmadathan, be appointed in his stead.

Legal Background

Rajeevaru was arrested on January 9, 2026, by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing the alleged misappropriation of gold ornaments from the temple. The SIT alleges his involvement in the removal and re‑plating of gold‑clad articles, linking him to prime accused Unnikrishnan Potty. After spending roughly 40 days in judicial custody, he was granted bail by the Kollam Vigilance Court on February 18. Since his release, he has not performed any rituals as Tantri, while his son has represented him at religious events.

Precedent of Familial Succession

By proposing his son, Rajeevaru follows a precedent set when Kandararu Mahesh Mohanaru succeeded his father after the latter was disqualified. The tradition of hereditary succession within the temple’s priesthood adds continuity but still requires the High Court’s concurrence before any appointment becomes official. TDB President K. Jayakumar confirmed receipt of the resignation letter and emphasized that any decision will be taken with judicial approval.

Implications for the Pilgrimage Season

The Sabarimala pilgrimage season is in full swing, and a sudden change in the chief priest’s role could affect both devotees and temple administration. Should Brahmadathan be appointed, it would provide stability while easing Rajeevaru’s health and legal burdens. Conversely, the move places the judiciary’s oversight at the forefront of religious governance, testing the balance between legal scrutiny and traditional priestly authority.