Ex‑RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan has challenged India’s massive investment in building a domestic semiconductor ecosystem, arguing that chips are easy to smuggle and that the country should focus on fundamentals instead. His remarks have sparked debate over the nation’s strategic technology goals.

  • Rajan argues chips are easily smuggled.
  • He questions India’s billions‑rupee investment in semiconductors.
  • He stresses the need for stronger fundamentals.

Raghuram Rajan, former Governor of the Reserve Bank of India, recently raised doubts about India’s ambitious semiconductor push, asserting that chips can be smuggled with relative ease. His comments, shared in an interview with Frontline, have ignited a vigorous debate among policymakers and investors alike.

Since 2021, India has launched the Semicon India Programme, committing over Rs 1.64 lakh crore to 12 major projects from companies such as Tata Electronics and Micron. The initiative, which recently expanded into Semicon India 2.0, aims to establish India as a key player in the global chip supply chain.

Rajan points out that the small size and lightweight nature of chipsets make them ideal for illicit transport across borders. He cites China and Russia’s use of intermediaries to acquire advanced Nvidia chips and other components, highlighting the vulnerability of India’s supply chain.

Why This Matters

Rajan’s critique underscores the need for India to strengthen not only its manufacturing capabilities but also its regulatory and enforcement frameworks to curb smuggling. The debate also raises questions about the sustainability of India’s chip strategy and the balance between investment and strategic autonomy.

"India must invest in both manufacturing and a robust policy environment to secure its semiconductor future," says Dr. Anil Kumar, a leading technology policy analyst.
Did You Know?: In 2021, semiconductor shortages led to a 60% drop in vehicle production in India.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What are the main objectives of India’s semiconductor investment?
2. Why is Rajan’s argument about smuggling significant for India’s tech policy?