A senior civil judge in Gonda alleges that Divisional Commissioner Durga Shakti Nagpal attempted to influence her case, prompting the Allahabad High Court to refer the matter to a criminal contempt bench. Activists demand an independent inquiry and the commissioner’s transfer.

  • Commissioner accused of exerting pressure on a judge
  • Allahabad High Court sends the conduct to a criminal contempt bench
  • Activists call for an independent inquiry and immediate transfer

Senior Civil Judge Shabina Khan of Gonda district disclosed that while on leave on July 15, 2026 she received repeated calls from a number linked to the office of Divisional Commissioner Durga Shakti Nagpal. The calls questioned the status of a 30‑year‑old land dispute case and the judge’s leave duration, creating an impression of undue pressure.

Judge Khan later reported that Commissioner Nagpal herself called, seeking to discuss the pending suit and pressing for a quicker resolution, allegedly because the land was needed for a new office building. Khan described the tone as coercive and stated that she would not entertain further discussion in open court.

Read Also:Ex-Gram Panchayat President Murder Case: Ninth Accused Arrested

On August 21, 2026, Justice Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi of the Allahabad High Court ruled that allegations of pressure on a judicial officer could not be dismissed lightly. He ordered that the matter be placed before the bench that handles criminal contempt, noting that the District Judge had already transferred the case on August 9, rendering the transfer plea moot but emphasizing the seriousness of the alleged intimidation.

Lucknow‑based social activist Amitabh Thakur immediately demanded an independent, high‑level inquiry and the transfer of Commissioner Nagpal from the Devipatan (Gonda) Division. “I have written to the Chief Secretary of Uttar Pradesh requesting the immediate transfer of the Gonda Commissioner and an independent investigation, as per the High Court’s order,” Thakur told The Hindu.

Why This Matters

BozokMedia analysis shows that such executive pressure threatens the credibility of the judiciary and underscores the need for clear boundaries between administrative officials and courts.

“Any attempt to influence a sitting judge undermines the rule of law and must be met with swift judicial sanction,” said a senior legal scholar.
Did You Know?: In India, contempt of court can lead to imprisonment for up to two years, emphasizing the seriousness with which the judiciary treats interference.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Did the Divisional Commissioner actually try to influence the case?

A: The judge’s testimony and the High Court’s referral suggest possible interference, but the final determination will be made by the contempt bench.

Q2: Which bodies will investigate the matter?

A: The High Court has directed an independent administrative inquiry, potentially involving the state government and a judicial oversight committee.