The Supreme Court of India has expressed grave concern over the harassment of a minor girl involved in CJP protests, ordering immediate police protection and an inquiry into threats against her family.

  • Supreme Court orders immediate police protection for a minor CJP protester and her family.
  • Allegations include stone-pelting at the minor's residence and the filing of an illegal FIR.
  • CJI Surya Kant emphasized that "a child is a child," prioritizing the safety of the minor over political disputes.

The Supreme Court of India, led by a three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant, has intervened in a distressing case involving the intimidation of a minor girl. The minor had participated in the protests organized by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar in July, which were centered around the alleged leak of the NEET question papers.

During the proceedings, the counsel for the minor alleged a pattern of systemic harassment. It was revealed that instead of targeting the primary instigators, the police had filed an FIR against the child. Furthermore, the lawyer presented claims that the minor's home had been pelted with stones, asserting that video evidence exists to prove these violent acts of intimidation.

Read Also:Youth Charged with Murdering Parents in Brahmavar

The bench, which included Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, expressed deep concern over the safety of the child. The CJI noted that if anti-social elements are roaming free and attempting to browbeat a child, it constitutes a serious breach of law and order. The court underscored that the protection of a minor is a non-negotiable priority.

Why This Matters

BozokMedia analysis shows that this case highlights a worrying trend of 'criminalizing' student dissent, specifically targeting minors to create a chilling effect on youth activism. By intervening, the Supreme Court is not only protecting an individual but is reinforcing the legal boundary that minors should not be subjected to the same punitive machinery as adults during peaceful protests.

The judiciary's insistence that 'a child is a child' serves as a critical reminder to law enforcement that the Juvenile Justice framework must supersede standard policing tactics during civil unrest.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta assured the court that the matter would be examined and necessary actions would be taken. In response, Justice Bagchi demanded immediate action regarding the FIR filed against the child and ordered the UP Police to provide security to the victim and her family, while the Parliament Street Police Station handles the investigation.

The court is currently overseeing petitions regarding the broader CJP protests and the police crackdown at Jantar Mantar. While a High-Powered Committee is investigating the overall crackdown, the court felt that the threats against the minor required urgent, standalone intervention to prevent irreparable harm.

Did You Know?: The Supreme Court of India has the power under Article 142 of the Constitution to pass any order necessary for doing 'complete justice' in any cause or matter pending before it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Why was the minor girl targeted?
The minor had participated in the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) protests against the NEET paper leak at Jantar Mantar.

Q2: What specific protection did the SC order?
The court ordered immediate police protection for the minor and her family by the UP Police and requested action on the FIR filed against her.