Insha Mushtaq, then only 14, was blinded by a pellet‑gun blast during a Delhi protest. She now recalls the harrowing incident that highlights the lethal reality behind a weapon marketed as ‘less lethal’ since its 2010 introduction in Jammu‑Kashmir.

Key Takeaways

  • Pellet guns were introduced in Jammu‑Kashmir in 2010 as a less‑lethal alternative.
  • Insha Mushtaq, aged 14, was blinded by a pellet‑gun blast during a Delhi protest.
  • The weapon, billed as less lethal, has caused severe injuries and sparked human‑rights concerns.

Insha Mushtaq recalls sitting by her window when the sudden crack of a pellet‑gun shattered the calm, and a burst of pellets struck her eyes, leaving her permanently blind. The trauma altered the course of her life forever.

The Indian security forces introduced pellet guns in 2010, promoting them as a “less lethal” crowd‑control option compared to live ammunition. By 2016, their use had surged across Jammu‑Kashmir, resulting in countless injuries and a growing outcry from rights groups.

Read Also:Consumers Won’t Pay UPI Charges, Confirms FM Sitharaman as Parliament Clears Tax Bill

Human‑rights organisations, both domestic and international, have repeatedly condemned the indiscriminate use of pellet guns, urging courts to curb their deployment. Several judicial orders have sought restrictions, yet implementation remains patchy.

Historical Background

Since 2010, pellet guns have become a staple in Jammu‑Kashmir’s security‑force arsenal, especially after the 2016 wave of protests. Despite being labeled “less lethal,” medical reports consistently link them to permanent eye damage, facial injuries, and, in rare cases, fatality.

Why This Matters

BozokMedia analysis shows that the continued reliance on pellet guns not only violates basic human rights but also erodes public trust in law‑enforcement agencies, potentially fueling further unrest.

"The deployment of pellet guns is a short‑term tactical fix that creates a long‑term human‑rights crisis," security analyst Dr. Riya Khan remarks.
Did You Know?: Pellet‑gun injuries often lead to irreversible blindness, forcing victims to depend on lifelong assistive devices.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question 1: Why were pellet guns marketed as “less lethal”?

Answer: They were intended to be a milder alternative to live rounds, but real‑world use shows they can cause severe, permanent injuries.

Question 2: Are there legal restrictions on their use?

Answer: Indian courts have issued orders limiting pellet‑gun deployment, yet inconsistencies in enforcement persist.