Officials reveal that OBC lists contain social 'classes' rather than pure 'castes,' leading the government to opt for an open-column method in the 2027 Census.

  • The 2027 Census will utilize an 'open-column' method for caste enumeration.
  • Officials claim OBC lists include occupational groups and social classes rather than just castes.
  • Opposition leaders have criticized the move, demanding specific caste coding.

In a significant policy shift, the Union government has decided to bypass the use of Central and State Other Backward Classes (OBC) lists during the upcoming 2027 Census. According to high-level officials, the decision stems from the realization that these lists are not purely composed of caste identities but include various social 'classes' and occupational groups.

The primary concern raised by officials is that many entries in the existing OBC rosters do not represent distinct castes. For instance, some lists include descriptions of people engaged in specific occupations, such as 'beggars' or 'tea garden workers' in Assam. Furthermore, entries like 'local borns' in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands categorize people by social status or origin rather than traditional caste hierarchies.

Read Also:CJP's Abhijeet Dipke Launches Nationwide Campaign to Revamp Rural Government Schools

Why This Matters

BozokMedia analysis shows that this methodological choice sits at the heart of a massive political tug-of-war in India. By opting for an 'open-column' method—where citizens write their own caste names—the government seeks to avoid the data contamination that would arise from using lists containing non-caste descriptors. However, this move also risks diluting the specific socio-political data that opposition parties are demanding.

The distinction between a social class and a caste identity is the technical crux that is driving the current census methodology.

The decision has drawn sharp criticism from opposition leaders, including Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge. They argue that the open-column method could lead to fragmented and unmanageable data, similar to the 2011 Socio-Economic Caste Census (SECC), which produced an overwhelming list of over 46 lakh caste names. The government had previously cited this complexity as a reason for not releasing the 2011 SECC data.

Historically, the enumeration of Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) has followed the Presidential lists. The debate now centers on the 'all other castes' category. While the National Commission for Backward Classes has noted that caste and social class often overlap, the government's priority appears to be maintaining a standardized and scientifically verifiable data set.

Did You Know?: The 2011 SECC exercise was so vast that it identified millions of unique caste-like identifiers, making it a logistical nightmare for policymakers.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the 'open-column' method in the census?
It is a system where respondents are allowed to manually write their caste name in a blank space, rather than selecting from a pre-defined government list.

2. Why can't the government use the existing OBC lists?
Because many entries in those lists describe occupational groups or social classes (like 'laborers') which do not qualify as specific castes.