Telangana’s Anti‑Corruption Bureau (ACB) registered a disproportionate assets case on Tuesday against B Ravinder, the chief engineer of the Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA). The move is part of ACB’s broader crackdown on public‑sector corruption, aiming to ensure that officials’ wealth aligns with their legitimate earnings.

Details of the Seized Assets

Searches at Ravinder’s residence, his office and nine other locations tied to relatives and associates uncovered assets valued at approximately Rs 9.24 crore. The haul includes five open plots, four residential flats, four acres of agricultural land, a semi‑furnished villa and a ground‑plus‑four (G+4) building. Authorities say the market value of these properties far exceeds the official valuations recorded with municipal authorities.

Physical Wealth Unearthed

In addition to real‑estate, investigators recovered Rs 3.82 lakh in cash, about Rs 45 lakh in bank deposits, gold ornaments weighing roughly 1,440 grams (≈ 1.44 kg), and approximately 12.5 kg of silver ornaments. The raid also yielded household items, electronic gadgets and four vehicles, all contributing to the total estimated worth of Rs 9.24 crore.

Legal Framework and Potential Consequences

The charge of disproportionate assets falls under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (amended 2018). If the court finds that Ravinder amassed wealth through illicit means while in office, he could face a hefty fine and up to seven years of imprisonment. The case underscores ACB’s resolve to pursue high‑ranking officials and serves as a deterrent for future misconduct.

Ongoing Investigation and Public Reaction

ACB officials confirmed that verification of further assets is still in progress. The revelations have sparked public outcry in Hyderabad, with citizens demanding greater accountability from civic bodies. The episode highlights the persistent challenge of curbing corruption in fast‑growing urban centers and reinforces the need for robust oversight mechanisms.

Overall, the swift seizure demonstrates a decisive step toward restoring public confidence in governmental institutions, signaling that no official is beyond the reach of law enforcement when it comes to financial impropriety.