The Telangana High Court has granted bail to Bhageerath, son of Union Minister of State Bandi Sanjay Kumar, in a POCSO case, requiring a Rs 1 lakh bond and two sureties. The decision follows accusations of sexual assault against a 17‑year‑old girl filed by her mother.
The Telangana High Court granted bail to Bandi Bhageerath, son of Union Minister of State Bandi Sanjay Kumar, on Thursday in a case registered under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The court directed him to furnish a bond of Rs 1 lakh and two sureties before releasing him from judicial custody.
Case Background
The complaint, filed on 8 May at Petbasheerabad Police Station, alleges that Bhageerath lured a 17‑year‑old girl with false promises of marriage, pressured her to consume alcohol, and repeatedly sexually assaulted her at a farmhouse on the outskirts of Hyderabad. Following the survivor’s statement, the police added Sections 5(1) and 6 of the POCSO Act, along with Section 64(2)(m) of the Indian Penal Code, to the charges.
Investigation and Arrest
Bhageerath was initially remanded to judicial custody until 29 May. After refusing to appear for questioning, a search operation was launched across multiple locations, including Karimnagar and Delhi. The breakthrough came on 16 May when police intercepted him near the Tech Park in Manchirevula, under the jurisdiction of Narsingi Police Station, and transferred him to Petbasheerabad.
Political Fallout
The case ignited a political debate in Telangana. BRS working president KT Rama Rao accused Chief Minister Revanth Reddy of shielding Bhageerath for nine days, questioning the delay in police action. The incident drew sharp criticism from both ruling and opposition leaders, underscoring the sensitive intersection of politics and justice.
Legal and Social Implications
Granting bail in a POCSO case highlights the judiciary’s insistence on due process, even when a high‑profile individual is involved. While the bail conditions are stringent, the decision underscores that no one is above the law and that the judicial system remains impartial. It also serves as a reminder that public trust hinges on transparent, unbiased legal proceedings.