An Additional District and Sessions Judge in Mohali rejected bail pleas of Gurdeep Singh alias Gill and Gurpreet Singh alias Kukki, citing the gravity of a ₹1 crore extortion demand and a shooting outside a property dealer’s residence. The court highlighted the gang’s cross‑border links and the risk of repeat offences if released.
Key Takeaways
- Mohali court denied bail to two alleged gang members.
- The case involves a ₹1 crore extortion demand and a shooting outside a home.
- Prosecution alleges international links and potential for further crimes.
An Additional District and Sessions Judge in Mohali dismissed the bail applications of two alleged members of the Lucky Patial gang, Gurdeep Singh alias Gill and Gurpreet Singh alias Kukki. The decision comes amid a serious case that includes a ₹1 crore extortion demand and a shooting incident outside the residence of a property dealer.
Case Background
The FIR states that unidentified assailants opened fire outside the home of property dealer Jasvir Singh while his wife, Taranjit Kaur, was present. Bullet marks were discovered on the main gate and on the family’s Fortuner SUV. CCTV footage reportedly captured two motorcycle‑riding youths carrying out the attack.
Further investigation revealed that Jasvir Singh had earlier received an international call from Romania. The caller identified himself as “Lucky Patial” and allegedly demanded ₹1 crore, threatening severe consequences for non‑payment. During the probe, Gurdeep Singh (Gill) and Gurpreet Singh (Kukki) were named as accused.
Legal Arguments
The defence argued that the accused were not named in the original FIR and have been in judicial custody since 1 April 2026, asserting that no direct evidence links them to the crime. They contended that granting bail would be premature given the lack of explicit charges.
Conversely, the prosecution submitted that both men are affiliated with the Lucky Patial gang, operating under directives from overseas gangsters. They emphasized that the extortion threat originated from abroad, and local operatives were used to execute the violent act, constituting grave offences that erode public confidence.
Judicial Reasoning
The judge observed that offenses such as extortion and shooting create an atmosphere of fear and insecurity, warranting a strict approach. The investigating officer’s report highlighted that the accused have been involved in other criminal cases, raising the possibility of repeat offences if released on bail. On these grounds, the bail applications were rejected.
Implications
The denial of bail not only ensures immediate accountability but also signals a tougher stance by Indian courts against cross‑border gang‑related crimes. This ruling may set a precedent for future cases involving international criminal networks, reinforcing the judiciary’s resolve to safeguard public order.