Journalist Abhishek Upadhyay has approached the Supreme Court to challenge an FIR filed against him in a road rage case, alleging it is a retaliatory move following his reports on donation irregularities at the Ayodhya Ram Temple.

  • Journalist Abhishek Upadhyay challenged an FIR filed by Ghaziabad Police in the Supreme Court.
  • The plea alleges the FIR is a retaliatory attempt to harass him for reporting on Ram Temple donation irregularities.
  • CJI Surya Kant has agreed to consider an early hearing of the matter.

The Supreme Court of India on Monday agreed to hear an urgent plea filed by journalist Abhishek Upadhyay. Upadhyay, known for flagging alleged irregularities in the management of donations at the Ayodhya Ram Temple, is challenging an FIR registered against him by the Ghaziabad Police in an alleged road rage incident.

Appearing before a Bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, counsel for Mr. Upadhyay argued that the client is facing increasingly severe accusations, including charges under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The defense maintained that these charges are a direct consequence of his independent journalistic investigations into sensitive financial matters involving the temple trust.

Read Also:Punjab and Haryana High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Appointment of Haryana AG as Judge

Why This Matters

BozokMedia analysis shows that this case highlights a growing concern regarding the 'criminalization of journalism' in India. When investigative reporters uncover financial discrepancies in high-profile institutions, the subsequent filing of unrelated criminal cases can serve as a powerful deterrent to free speech and investigative rigor.

The use of criminal litigation to target investigative reporters is a significant challenge to the constitutional mandate of a free press.

The petitioner has raised serious procedural concerns, stating that a copy of the FIR has not been provided to him. Furthermore, the plea alleges that the police have been exerting undue pressure on local shopkeepers to delete CCTV footage that could potentially exonerate him from the road rage allegations.

The Chief Justice has requested detailed case specifics and indicated that the matter may be listed for hearing as early as August 25, 2026. This development is being closely watched by media rights organizations worldwide.

Did You Know?: The Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial court under the Constitution of India, making it the final arbiter of legal disputes.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question 1: What is the core allegation in Abhishek Upadhyay's plea?
Answer: He alleges that the FIR against him is a concocted attempt to harass him for his reporting on Ram Temple donation irregularities.

Question 2: Which court is hearing this matter?
Answer: The Supreme Court of India, presided over by CJI Surya Kant.