Former Karnataka Forest Secretary A.N. Yellappa Reddy has voiced strong opposition to a proposal allowing 5% of protected park land for infrastructure, warning of severe ecological consequences.
In a significant move to protect urban ecology, former Karnataka Forests, Ecology and Environment Secretary A.N. Yellappa Reddy has formally urged the Chief Secretary to reconsider a proposed amendment to the Karnataka Government Parks (Preservation) Act, 1975. The amendment seeks to allow up to 5% of protected park land to be diverted for infrastructure projects.
In a detailed letter sent on August 23, Mr. Reddy argued that allowing even a marginal 5% diversion could set a catastrophic precedent. He cautioned that once this door is opened, it could lead to much larger portions of protected green spaces being targeted for various development projects in the future.
The Ecological Argument
Highlighting the unique value of landmarks like Lalbagh, Mr. Reddy emphasized that the ecological worth of a park cannot be measured through mere acreage or percentages. He pointed out that the true essence of such parks lies in their ancient trees, complex soil structures, water systems, and rich biodiversity.
The ecological character of a park is irreplaceable and cannot be quantified by simple mathematical percentages.
Mr. Reddy further questioned whether the proposed amendment was backed by rigorous scientific studies or recommendations from independent ecologists, horticulturists, and urban planners. He demanded a thorough examination of the Complete Record, including Detailed Project Reports (DPRs), environmental assessments, and the reasons for rejecting alternative alignments.
Why This Matters
BozokMedia analysis shows that such legislative amendments often prioritize short-term infrastructure gains over long-term environmental stability. If the 5% provision is legalized, it creates a legal loophole that could be exploited to systematically erode urban green belts across the state.
Historical Background: The preservation of public parks in Karnataka has long been a subject of intense debate. Historically, significant projects have been relocated to protect ecological integrity—most notably the decision to move the construction of Veera Soudha away from the sensitive zones of Lalbagh to ensure the park's heritage remained intact.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is the core of the controversy?
The controversy revolves around a proposed amendment to allow 5% of protected park land to be used for infrastructure development.
2. What is the potential risk mentioned by experts?
Experts warn that this 5% provision could serve as a slippery slope, leading to the loss of much larger sections of public parks in the future.
