On July 9, 2026, the Special Investigation Team (SIT) submitted a petition to the Supreme Court demanding permission to question Circle Inspector S.S.V.V. Nagaraju without the video‑recording constraints imposed by the Andhra Pradesh High Court. The SIT argues that such restrictions hamper a thorough investigation and seeks a broader order that allows full interrogation.

Legal Background

The Andhra Pradesh High Court had previously directed that the accused officer be questioned on‑record and that the entire process be video‑documented. SIT’s petition challenges this directive, asserting that the procedural safeguards could be used to shield the officer from rigorous scrutiny. By approaching the apex court, the team is testing the limits of state‑level judicial orders in high‑profile custodial death cases.

Parallel Proceedings

Simultaneously, the Krishnalanka police station lodged a separate FIR against the suspended CI Nagaraju and several staff members under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Section 108 of the BNSS (abetment of suicide) Act. This filing relates to the suspicious death of Perupogu Kranthi Kumar, a resident of Phakeergudem, Vijayawada, whose family alleges repeated summonses and intimidation by the same officer.

Implications

If the Supreme Court grants SIT’s request, it could broaden investigative powers in custodial death inquiries, compelling law‑enforcement agencies to adhere to stricter accountability standards. The case also underscores the growing use of the SC/ST Act to address alleged police excesses, signalling a shift toward stronger protective legislation for vulnerable communities.

Public Reaction

The incident has sparked outrage among civil‑society groups and local residents, who demand transparent accountability and swift justice for the victim’s family. Mental‑health helplines have been highlighted, urging anyone experiencing suicidal thoughts to dial 100 for immediate assistance.